Speaker summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Wimmer results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Nature, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 969.287 faulty-reasoning hits from 341 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (22,962 of 28,364 speakers). This Madeline Wimmer is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Madeline Wimmer
Speaker details
Total words: 341
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos341 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.8%23.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos