Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maddox results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 579 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Maddox is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Maddox
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠1%Maddox (selected)3%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,127
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos