Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These M. Night Shyamalan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,848 of 28,364 speakers). This M. Night Shyamalan is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
M. Night Shyamalan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠90%M. Night Shyamalan (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510090.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How to end a TV show⁠45%
The Verge⁠56%By Andrew Webster⁠0%6/29/2026, 5:00:00 AM