Speaker summary
70%6 analyzed articles/videos114.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LULAC results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Bandwagon, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.5% saturation with 64.008 hits. Analysis detected 228.008 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (14,528 of 28,287 speakers). This LULAC is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
LULAC

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
30.8% BS Score6 analyzed videos114.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.5%59.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate