Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video109.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Diaz results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 73.3% saturation with 80.25 hits. Analysis detected 127.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,460 of 26,155 speakers). This Luke Diaz is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Luke Diaz
Speaker details
Total words: 109.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
52.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 73.3%73.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.2%32.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 73.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos