Speaker summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos81.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 77.7% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (15,996 of 26,155 speakers). This Luis is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Luis
Speaker details
Total words: 81.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos81.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 77.7%77.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.2%12.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 77.7%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos