Speaker summary
⁠67%4 analyzed articles/videos86 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucy Powell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 53.1% saturation with 50.17 hits. Analysis detected 253.17 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,003 of 27,556 speakers). This Lucy Powell is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Lucy Powell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 86
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.3% percentile
23.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos86 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 53.1%53.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Recency Bias: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos