Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucie Altenburg results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 62.2% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 247 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,365 of 28,364 speakers). This Lucie Altenburg is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Lucie Altenburg
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 62.2%62.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 62.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 4.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos