Speaker summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucas results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,547 of 28,364 speakers). This Lucas is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Lucas
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.3%51.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.7%23.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 39.5%39.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos