Speaker summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louie Barletta results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hindsight Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 82 hits . Analysis detected 645.609 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,199 of 28,364 speakers). This Louie Barletta is better (less manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Louie Barletta
Speaker details
Total words: 237
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.2% percentile 9.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos237 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.2% 21.2% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst