Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles County results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Circular Reasoning, and Framing Effect, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 53 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,129 of 28,364 speakers). This Los Angeles County is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Los Angeles County
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos