Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lore Gruenbaum results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 311.01 faulty-reasoning hits from 230 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (17,970 of 26,386 speakers). This Lore Gruenbaum is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Lore Gruenbaum
Speaker details
Total words: 230
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
20.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos230 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos