Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video113.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Logan Simon results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 211 faulty-reasoning hits from 113.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,978 of 28,364 speakers). This Logan Simon is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Logan Simon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 113.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos113.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos