Speaker summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lizzie Fletcher results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 47.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,496 of 28,364 speakers). This Lizzie Fletcher is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Lizzie Fletcher
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
47.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 47.4%47.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos