Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Glazer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,360 of 28,364 speakers). This Liz Glazer is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Liz Glazer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
37.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Crime is mostly down in NYC⁠50%
Gothamist⁠77%By Charles Lane⁠36%7/13/2026, 10:00:52 AM