Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video151.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LittleFire131 results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 512.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 151.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,579 of 28,364 speakers). This LittleFire131 is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
LittleFire131
Speaker details
Total words: 151.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
30.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos151.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.5%53.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos