Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Green results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35.9% saturation with 48.8 hits. Analysis detected 238.133 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,074 of 28,364 speakers). This Lisa Green is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Lisa Green
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
20.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos