Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linton Mohammed results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Personal Incredulity and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 86.3% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Linton Mohammed is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Linton Mohammed
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
45.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.3%86.3%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.3%, sitewide 11.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos