Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video418.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindy Li results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,568.259 faulty-reasoning hits from 418.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,085 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindy Li is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Lindy Li
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 418.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.6% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos418.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 21.3%21.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos