Speaker summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 418.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindy Li results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Anecdotal , and Burden of Proof , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 163 hits . Analysis detected 1,568.259 faulty-reasoning hits from 418.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,085 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindy Li is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Lindy Li
Speaker details
Total words: 418.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos418.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 24.2% 24.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 18.7% 18.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst