Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Vonn results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,140 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsey Vonn is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Lindsey Vonn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos150 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 39.3%39.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos