Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Rodarmer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 77.3% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 149 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,885 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsey Rodarmer is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Lindsey Rodarmer
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 77.3%77.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 77.3%77.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 77.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 77.3%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos