Speaker summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 103 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 4 videos, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,890 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsay is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Lindsay
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Video count: 4
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
13.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos