Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video130.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lincoln Restler results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 53.286 hits. Analysis detected 331.468 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,463 of 28,364 speakers). This Lincoln Restler is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Lincoln Restler
Speaker details
Total words: 130.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
25.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos130.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos