Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,262.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lincoln Mitchell results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 313.268 hits. Analysis detected 2,494.15 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,262.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,333 of 28,012 speakers). This Lincoln Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Lincoln Mitchell
Speaker details
Total words: 1,262.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.8%24.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.5%0.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos