Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lina Mendoni results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,666 of 28,364 speakers). This Lina Mendoni is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Lina Mendoni
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos