Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Clifford results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Status Quo Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 81.75 hits. Analysis detected 389.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,079 of 28,364 speakers). This Lily Clifford is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Lily Clifford
Speaker details
Total words: 124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
22.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos124 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 58.6%58.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos