Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video333.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Bond results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 106.875 hits. Analysis detected 471.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 333.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,690 of 28,364 speakers). This Lily Bond is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Lily Bond
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 333.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos333.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.5%28.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.2%7.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos