Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video80.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lillian Ortiz-Self results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 67.4% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 359.254 faulty-reasoning hits from 80.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,251 of 28,364 speakers). This Lillian Ortiz-Self is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Lillian Ortiz-Self
Speaker details
Total words: 80.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos80.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 82.6%82.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 67.4%67.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 82.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos