Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lidia Favario results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 213.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,473 of 28,364 speakers). This Lidia Favario is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Lidia Favario
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos