Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Li Qiang results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Straw Man, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,301 of 28,364 speakers). This Li Qiang is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Li Qiang
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos