Speaker summary
⁠67%3 analyzed articles/videos126.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lewis Hamilton results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 69.2% saturation with 121.174 hits. Analysis detected 245.174 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,189 of 28,364 speakers). This Lewis Hamilton is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Lewis Hamilton
Speaker details
Total words: 126.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
20.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos126.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 69.2%69.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 69.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos