Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leo Falit-Baiamonte results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Leo Falit-Baiamonte is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Leo Falit-Baiamonte
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510091.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos