Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leila Wilson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,102 of 28,364 speakers). This Leila Wilson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Leila Wilson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
35.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos