Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leighton Cooper results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Loss Aversion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Leighton Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Leighton Cooper
Speaker details
Total words: 165
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
16.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 24.8%24.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos