Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Fiscal Bureau results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 70.9% saturation with 43.267 hits. Analysis detected 79.267 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,483 of 28,364 speakers). This Legislative Fiscal Bureau is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Legislative Fiscal Bureau
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 70.9%70.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.9%41.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 70.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos