Speaker summary
ā 85%1 analyzed article/video307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Smith results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 54.1% saturation with 166.197 hits. Analysis detected 1,007.659 faulty-reasoning hits from 307 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ā 26% (20,740 of 27,843 speakers). This Lee Smith is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Lee Smith
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 26%Lee Smith (selected)17%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 307
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos307 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 54.1%54.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 54.1%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos