Speaker summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lee Goldberg results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 69 hits . Analysis detected 556.107 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,062 of 28,364 speakers). This Lee Goldberg is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Lee Goldberg
Speaker details
Total words: 329
Video count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos329 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 17.5% 17.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst