Speaker summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Murray results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Pessimism Bias , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 72 hits . Analysis detected 499.441 faulty-reasoning hits from 314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,647 of 28,364 speakers). This Leah Murray is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Leah Murray
Speaker details
Total words: 314
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos314 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst