Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Regan results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Begging the Question, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 511 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (24,781 of 26,870 speakers). This Lauren Regan is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Lauren Regan
Speaker details
Total words: 511
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos511 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.1%33.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos