Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video160.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Bonds results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 437.284 faulty-reasoning hits from 160.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,479 of 28,364 speakers). This Lauren Bonds is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Lauren Bonds
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 160.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
23.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos160.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 40.3%40.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos