Speaker summary
70% 1 analyzed article/video 138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laurel Coco results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 68.2% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 785.772 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of 40% (17,052 of 28,364 speakers). This Laurel Coco is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Laurel Coco
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 24.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos138 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 68.2% 68.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 49.4% 49.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 62.4% 62.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 37.3% 37.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 37.3% 37.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 32.6% 32.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Anecdotal: Speaker 68.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 62.4%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 49.4%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst