Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Tingle results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,476 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Tingle is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Laura Tingle
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
33.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 36.8%36.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 29.8%29.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos