Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video907.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Clery results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 80.094 hits. Analysis detected 759.704 faulty-reasoning hits from 907.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,096 of 28,364 speakers). This Laura Clery is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Laura Clery
Speaker details
Total words: 907.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos907.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos