Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laqueur results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 73.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 200 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,418 of 28,364 speakers). This Laqueur is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Laqueur
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 73.5%73.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 73.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos