Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Langrune en Commun association results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Nature, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,256 of 28,364 speakers). This Langrune en Commun association is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Langrune en Commun association
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos