Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video105.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lance Ehrig results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 191 faulty-reasoning hits from 105.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,786 of 28,364 speakers). This Lance Ehrig is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Lance Ehrig
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 105.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
30.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos105.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos