Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video54.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lan Xinzhen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 46.125 hits. Analysis detected 169.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 54.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,520 of 28,364 speakers). This Lan Xinzhen is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Lan Xinzhen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos54.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos