Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video50.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lamine Yamal results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 69.4% saturation with 40.953 hits. Analysis detected 106.953 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,250 of 28,364 speakers). This Lamine Yamal is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Lamine Yamal
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 50.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
49.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 69.4%69.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.8%38.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 38.8%38.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 69.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos