Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyndall Brown results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 220.557 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,750 of 28,364 speakers). This Kyndall Brown is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Kyndall Brown
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.1%46.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos