Speaker summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 26.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Whitmere results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , False Dilemma , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26.667 hits . Analysis detected 189.167 faulty-reasoning hits from 26.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 63.9% and a BS Rank of 77% (6,541 of 28,364 speakers). This Kyle Whitmere is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Kyle Whitmere
Speaker details
Total words: 26.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 63.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos26.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 100.0% 100.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 100.0% 100.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 75.0% 75.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 50.0% 50.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst